Texts Used for this Discussion

The main text used in our discussion:

Valdes, G., Capitelli, S. & Alvarez, L. (2011). Latino children learning english:Steps in the journey. New York: Teachers College Press.


Other possible texts of reference:

Spradlin, K. (2012). Diversity matters: Understanding diversity in schools (2nd ed). Belmont, CA:Wadsworth/Cengage.


Turnbull, A., Turnbull, R., Shank, M. & Leal, D. (2007). Exceptional lives: Special education in today's schools (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.


Valle, J. W. & Conner, D. J. (2010). Rethinking disability: A disability studies approach to inclusive practices. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Monday, September 26, 2011

Building Background Knowledge for Teachers of ELLs

While digesting chapters two and three, I was overwhelmed by the numerous connections that I have made thus far in terms of what I have and am learning in my courses as well as an ESL program through Mercy Bridges that I volunteer for, which almost exactly mimics the One-On-One study demonstrated in this book. As the rigorous researcher, I picked a few concepts to broaden background knowledge that would be essential for all teachers in relation to ELLs in their classroom.

The Structured English Immersion, (SEI) an assimilation approach, and Bilingual programs a pluralistic approach, which were described in the text are only two of the various types of implemented ESL classroom instruction. I further researched other popular ESL program models found in schools across America. All program models are either assimilative meaning, the ELL is mainstreamed into the dominant culture, or pluralistic where there is support in the minority language and culture to build self-esteem and achievement.

Language maintenance programs are pluralistic programs, which in short concepts are derived from L1 and transferred in L2 . Another ESL program model is Enrichment programs, which are pluralistic and encompass classrooms with both native speakers of English and ELLs 50% English 50% Language other than English (LOTE). Immersion programs umbrella Two Way, Enrichment, and English Immersion. Two way is a pluralistic approach and involves a gradual increase of English incorporated in the curriculum until 50% of instruction is English. Enrichment, a pluralistic approach. English is an assimilation approach. Focusing back to the programs used in the text SEI and the Bilingual approach, I believe they made the best choice in picking the Bilingual approach for their research because pluralistic models help with developing both L1 and L2, which is helpful for conversing at home and keeping their culture evidently existing in their life.

I also took note in the Design Research Experiment. As teachers, it is inevitable that we will be consciously and unconsciously researching and conducting experiments based on the situations that take place during the day. Some inquiries will last a day and others will exceed a school year of research. It is important for us as educators to be aware of the reliable research available to us so we can continue to best facilitate English language learning.

4 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I question what is the most effective program model for ELLs?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I enjoy the connections you have to your personal experience. It truly gives you insight into the concepts, and research we are grappling with. I was particularly interested in the pluralistic enrichment program where the day is split 50/50 between languages. I believe this would be a beneficial implementation for all students in a classroom, not just ELL students. By exposing all students in the classroom to new linguistic experiences you truly deepen the students understanding and tolerance to uniqueness. All groups of students would see how difficult learning in a language outside your native could be? If our society is so mobile why have these programs not been more readily implemented yet?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I also found the Two Way approach to be a great way to reach ELLs. Starting instruction using mostly L1 and gradually building L2 into the curriculum seems to be an effective approach. This would allow students to start with what they know (L1) and develop what they don't know (new curriculum content AND L2). In RCSD, John James Audubon, School #33 this is the approach that is used for SLA. Many of my students appeared to have a grasp on the English language, but I am not sure about academic English language.

    ReplyDelete